Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. United States

Good Law
462 F. Supp. 1227·1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14003
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 5, 1978Civ. R-77-0180California8,426 words

Opinion

Opinion

MacBRIDE, J.

This is the second of a series of decisions on the choice of law questions presented by this action brought by Southern Pacific Transportation Company (Southern Pacific) under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346 (b), 2671 et seq., against the United States. The issue to be resolved in this decision is the choice of law rule of Nevada. The facts may be stated briefly. On April 28, 1973,18 DODX railcars owned by the United States laden with bombs being transported by Southern Pacific from Nevada to Port Chicago, California under a contract with the Department of the Navy exploded in Southern Pacific’s Antelope trainyard near Roseville, California. ■ The explosions caused major damage to the trainyard and the surrounding area. As a result, hundreds of lawsuits were filed against Southern Pacific, the United States, and various other defendants. In addition, Southern Pacific sued the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) to recover, inter alia, for damage to the trainyard, railcars and their lading, loss of freight revenues, loss of use of property and capital, and sums paid in settlement of third-party claims. The United States counterclaimed for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.