Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. United States

Good Law
462 F. Supp. 1193·1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14141
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 28, 1978Civ. R-77-0180California15,801 words

Opinion

Opinion

MacBRIDE, J.

The question presently before this court is whether federal or state law provides the rule of decision governing the application of contributory or comparative negligence standards to this action under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346 (b), 2671 et seq. The factual background in which the question arises can be stated briefly. On April 28,1973,18 DODX boxcars owned by the United States and laden with bombs being transported from Nevada to Port Chicago, California, by Southern Pacific Transportation Company (Southern Pacific) under contract with the Department of the Navy, exploded in the Antelope trainyard of Southern Pacific near Roseville, California. The explosions caused major damage to the trainyard and the surrounding area. As a result, Southern Pacific instituted this action under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) to recover, inter alia, for damage to the trainyard, railcars and lading in the railcars, loss of freight revenues, loss of use of Southern Pacific property and capital, and sums paid in settlement of third-party claims. All third-party suits arising from the explosions have been settled, so that the only claims remaining are the primary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.