Pomeroy

Pomeroy v. Zion

Good Law
19 Cal. App. 3d 473·1971 Cal. App. LEXIS 1298·96 Cal. Rptr. 822
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 23, 1971Civ. 29033California1,263 words

Opinion

Opinion

Devine, J.

This appeal calls for construction of section 998 of the Code of Civil Procedure, a section enacted in 1969 which has not been interpreted previously.

There are two sections which provide for allowance or disallowance of costs following an offer to compromise. Section 997 has been effective and has been altered but slightly since the adoption of the Code of Civil Procedure in 1872, and enactment of its predecessor (which the code took over unchanged) 100 years ago. (Stats. 1851, ch. 5, § 390, p. 113.) At the time of the order appealed from (Aug. 10, 1970) the statute read, as it does now: “The defendant may, at any time before the trial or judgment, serve upon the plaintiff an offer to allow judgment to be taken against him for the sum or property, or to the effect therein specified. If the plaintiff accepts the offer, and gives notice thereof within 10 days, he may file the offer, with proof of notice of acceptance, and the clerk, or the judge where there is no clerk, must thereupon enter judgment accordingly. If the notice of acceptance be not given, the offer is to be deemed withdrawn, and cannot be given in evidence upon the trial; and if the plaintiff fails to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.