Uribe

Uribe v. Howie

Caution
19 Cal. App. 3d 194·1971 Cal. App. LEXIS 1271·96 Cal. Rptr. 493
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 10, 1971Civ. 10718California6,768 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gardner, J.

Petitioner Amalia Uribe filed a petition for writ of mandate on April 8, 1969, seeking to compel respondent Robert Howie, as Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner, to permit her to inspect and copy pest control operator reports in his possession.

An order to show cause why the mandate should not issue was issued and Jose Uribe was appointed guardian ad litem to prosecute the action for the minor petitioner.

Certain interested individuals and business (Washburn & Bell, et al.) were allowed to intervene, and thereafter filed a complaint in intervention for an order enjoining respondent Howie from disclosing any of the information contained in said reports. An order to show cause regarding a preliminary injunction was issued, and at the same time, interveners noticed a motion , to strike the order to show cause why the peremptory writ of mandate should not issue.

Thereafter, the People of the State of California were allowed to intervene, joining petitioner in her claim, and filed their complaint in intervention.

Interveners’ demurrer to the People’s complaint was overruled.

Trial ensued, at the conclusion of which the court filed its notice of intended decision,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.