In Re Marriage of Pinto

Good Law
104 Cal. Rptr. 371·1972 Cal. App. LEXIS 739·28 Cal. App. 3d 86
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 12, 1972Civ. 30813California979 words

Opinion

Opinion

Husband appeals from that portion of an interlocutory judgment of dissolution awarding wife one-half of the proceeds of a claim for damages for personal injuries suffered by him after the parties had separated and granting wife a hen upon one-half of the proceeds of any recovery made by him in his action for damages pending in the superior court.

This appeal involves a single issue—whether a “cause of action” for damages for personal injuries suffered by a spouse constitutes “community property personal injury damages” within the meaning of subdivision (c) of section 4800 of the Civil Code of the Family Law Act, when the spouse has received no money or other property either in satisfaction of a judgment for damages or pursuant to an, agreement for the settlement or compromise of his claim for damages at the time the interlocutory judgment of dissolution is entered.

Husband contends that the provisions of sections 4800 and 5126 of the Civil Code, construed together, preclude the division of a claim or cause of action for personal injury damages unless money or other property has actually been received.

Prior to the enactment of the Family Law Act, there was a division…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.