Midway Orchards v. County of Butte

Good Law
1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 569·220 Cal. App. 3d 765·269 Cal. Rptr. 796
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 21, 1990Docket Nos. C004316, C003276California6,772 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

In this opinion we decide two related appeals which have been consolidated at the request of one of the parties.

Both appeals involve unsuccessful attempts by Midway Orchards and Southfork Developers (collectively Midway) to develop for residential purposes a 110-acre almond orchard located about 2 miles outside the City of Chico (City).

In an unpublished portion of the opinion, we first consider appeal No. C004316. There, we reject Midway’s attack on a 1982 amendment to the Butte County General Plan (General Plan) that restricted Midway’s orchard property to agricultural uses by placing it outside a “greenline” defining the outer limit of urban development in the City.

We next consider appeal No. C003276. This appeal concerns attempts in 1984 by the Butte County Board of Supervisors (Board) to allow Midway to develop its property by amending the general plan and applicable zoning ordinance and by entering into a development agreement pursuant to article 2.5 of division 1 of title 7 of the Government Code (§§ 65864-65869.5). The Board’s attempts to amend the general plan and zoning ordinance were greeted by a citizens’ referendum petition. In an unpublished portion of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.