Hurt

NEC Electronics Inc. v. Hurt

Good Law
1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 194·208 Cal. App. 3d 772·256 Cal. Rptr. 441
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 8, 1989H002543California3,048 words

Opinion

Opinion

Elia, J.

Respondent NEC Electronics Inc. (NEC) filed a motion to amend its judgment against Ph Components (Ph) to add appellant Porter Hurt (Hurt) as a judgment debtor. The trial court granted the motion and Hurt brings this appeal. We reverse.

Factual and Procedural Background

NEC filed suit against Ph in March 1985 to recover amounts due for goods which NEC sold to Ph. Frank Finelli, Ph’s chief financial officer, was served with the NEC complaint. Neither Finelli nor Hurt, the sole shareholder and chief executive officer of Ph, was named as a party or served in his individual capacity. Ph subsequently appeared by filing a general denial.

In April 1985, Finelli met with representatives of NEC to discuss the financial problems of Ph and its need to compromise the claims of unsecured creditors. NEC acknowledged Ph’s financial problems and stated that it would not take further legal action at least through May 1985.

In May 1985, Hurt, Finelli and Brad Hartman, a representative of NEC, attended a meeting of Ph’s unsecured creditors. The creditors were informed that Hurt was willing to advance $1.5 million of his personal funds to provide additional working capital for Ph. Ph…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.