United States v. Christopher Mann

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 11, 201110-10161California249 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 11 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 10-10161 & 10-10163

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. Nos. 2:08-cr-50102-GMS 3:99-cr-00146-GMS v.

MEMORANDUM *

CHRISTOPHER LEE MANN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 5, 2011 **

Before: B. FLETCHER, CLIFTON, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Christopher Lee Mann appeals from the

consecutive 44-month and 24-month sentences imposed following the revocation

of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate

and remand for resentencing.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Mann contends that the district court procedurally erred by relying on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.