Hallock

People v. Hallock

Good Law
1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 182·208 Cal. App. 3d 595·256 Cal. Rptr. 264
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 6, 1989F009010California5,729 words

Opinion

Opinion

Best, J.

Following trial by jury defendant was convicted of first degree burglary (count I; Pen. Code, § 459), assault with intent to commit rape (count II; § 220), attempted rape (count III; §§ 664, 261, subd. (2)), and intimidating a witness (count IV; § 136.1, subd. (c)(1)). The jury found defendant not guilty of attempted rape (count III; §§ 664, 261, subd. (2)) and petty theft (count V; § 484).

A probation revocation hearing was held simultaneously with the jury trial on the above charges.

Defendant was sentenced to a total of nine years and eight months, as follows: count I (burglary), the upper term of six years; count II (assault with intent to commit rape), the upper term of six years stayed pursuant to section 654; and count IV (intimidation of a witness), a consecutive upper term of four years, with one year stayed. In addition, defendant was sentenced to a three-year consecutive term on the probation violation, with all but eight months stayed.

We reverse defendant’s conviction for intimidating a witness (count IV; § 136.1, subd. (c)(1)) and affirm the judgment in all other respects.

Statement of Facts

On January 7, 1987, Louise G., age 77, was watching the news…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.