Estate of Wilts

Good Law
145 Cal. Rptr. 759·80 Cal. App. 3d 599
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 3, 197842231California2,099 words

Opinion

Opinion

Nichols, Catterton & Downing, M.R. Downing and Roy A. Sharff for Objector and Respondent.

OPINION

LOW, J. [*]

If a transferee is not a surviving spouse, ancestor or issue of the decedent, the transferee cannot gain the most preferred inheritance tax status, unless the decedent stood in the "mutually acknowledged relationship of a parent" to the transferee. This case asks whether this relationship was established where the transferee was not related by blood or marriage and never lived in the decedent's household. We do not believe the required relationship was established in this case.

Otto Wilts died on November 6, 1974, and his holographic will of June 8, 1961, was admitted to probate. Wilts left his entire estate to Betty Barnes and six of her nine children.

In 1935 or 1936, Mrs. Rockwell (Betty's mother) divorced her husband and moved to Oakland, California, with her daughters. She was awarded custody of her children. After the move to California, Betty had no contact with her father. In Oakland, they first lived in an apartment building where Otto Wilts was also a tenant. Before Betty was 15, she and Wilts had established a close, cordial relationship. When Betty was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.