Symonds

Symonds v. Mercury Savings and Loan Ass'n

Good Law
1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 1265·225 Cal. App. 3d 1458·275 Cal. Rptr. 871·90 Daily Journal DAR 13796·13 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 316
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 4, 1990B047670California3,384 words

Opinion

Opinion

Johnson, J.

Plaintiff Fran Symonds appeals from the order of dismissal in her action against defendants Mercury Savings and Loan Association (Mercury) and Debra Winthrop. We conclude the trial court erred in sustaining the defendants’ demurrer in its entirety and reverse.

Statement of Facts and Proceedings Below

In accord with the governing standard of review, the factual allegations contained in appellant’s complaint are deemed admitted by defendants’ demurrer. (White v. Davis (1975) 13 Cal.3d 757, 765 [ 533 P.2d 222 ]; Maheu v. CBS, Inc. (1988) 201 Cal.App.3d 662, 669-670 [ 247 Cal.Rptr. 304 ].) Appellant’s complaint alleges the following facts.

On November 28, 1988, appellant deposited a check drawn on the account of Karen Nyeholt payable in the sum of $5,316.83 into her Mercury account. At that time, Nyeholt’s account contained sufficient funds to cover the check and continued to have such funds for another 44 days.

Mercury failed to properly process and present the check although it informed appellant the check was collected. On July 24, 1989, almost eight months after the initial deposit in appellant’s account, Mercury learned there were insufficient funds to cover the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.