Imp. Irrig. Dist. v. St. Wat. Resources Ctrl.

Good Law
225 Cal. App. 3d 548·275 Cal. Rptr. 250
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 21, 1990D008521California9,430 words

Opinion

Opinion

John W. Krautkraemer for Intervener and Respondent.

OPINION

FROEHLICH, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying the petition for writ of mandate brought by Imperial Irrigation District (IID) to overturn a decision of the State Water Resources Control Board (Board).

In 1980 a private citizen requested the Department of Water Resources to investigate alleged misuse of water by IID which had resulted in a rise in the level of the Salton Sea, flooding the citizen's farmland. After an investigation, an initial conclusion of water waste, and unproductive communications with IID, the Department of Water Resources referred the matter to the Board for investigation and action. The Board held a hearing which encompassed a period of six days late in 1983, taking testimony and receiving evidence from a number of sources including the original complaining citizen, the Department of Water Resources, IID, a number of other governmental agencies, and the intervener herein, the Environmental Defense Fund, Inc.

On June 21, 1984, the Board issued its decision regarding misuse of water by IID, herein designated Decision 1600 (hereafter sometimes referred to as Board Decision) which consisted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.