Glennon

People v. Glennon

Good Law
1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 1401·225 Cal. App. 3d 101·276 Cal. Rptr. 1·90 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8845
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 15, 1990A047950California1,455 words

Opinion

Opinion

Stein, J.

The sole issue raised by this appeal is whether a restitution fine of $10,000 should be stricken because the trial court failed to advise appellant of the fine prior to accepting his plea of no contest. We conclude that although appellant has failed to show that he was prejudiced by the court’s failure to so advise, he must be given the opportunity to withdraw his plea.

Factual and Procedural Background

Appellant was the purchasing manager for the biochemistry and biophysics departments of the University of California at San Francisco. Utilizing his own outside company, appellant engaged in a number of fraudulent sales to the university which were accomplished by means of appellant’s position as purchasing manager.

Prior to the preliminary hearing, appellant pleaded no contest to the charge that he misappropriated over $300,000 in state funds over a period of 10 years while employed by the university. (Pen. Code, § 424, subd. 1.) He also admitted the special allegation that the amount taken was over $100,000 thereby exposing himself to an additional two-year term. (Pen. Code, § 12022.6, subd. (b).)

Prior to entering this plea, appellant was advised of and waived his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.