Summers

Summers v. City of Cathedral City

Good Law
1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 1253·225 Cal. App. 3d 1047·275 Cal. Rptr. 594·90 Daily Journal DAR 13657·90 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8868
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 29, 1990E006933California13,020 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hollenhorst, J.

Introduction

A former municipal employee brought an action for wrongful termination. After the trial court granted the motion of the City of Cathedral City (City) for summary judgment, the City moved for an award of sanctions pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 128.5. That motion was denied.

The employee (plaintiff) appeals from the judgment in favor of the City. The City cross-appeals from the denial of its motion for sanctions. The City also requests an award of damages pursuant to section 907, on the grounds that plaintiff’s appeal is frivolous.

We affirm the summary judgment, finding that each of the four principal arguments raised by the City is a complete legal defense to one or more of plaintiff’s four causes of action. We also affirm the order denying the City’s motion under section 128.5, finding that the record does not indicate that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to award sanctions. Finally, we impose sanctions against plaintiff’s counsel for prosecuting a frivolous appeal.

Factual and Procedural Background

The following facts are undisputed: Plaintiff was hired by the City in 1983, and by December of 1984 had risen to become the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.