Coombe

Pat Rose Associates v. Coombe

Caution
1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 1181·225 Cal. App. 3d 9·275 Cal. Rptr. 1·90 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8328
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 13, 1990E004350California5,197 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dabney, J.

Cross-complainant and appellant, Pat Rose Associates (PRA), a limited partnership, sued cross-defendants and appellants, Mervyn G. Flory, Jr., D. Wesley Coombe and others not parties to this appeal, for (1) breach of a hotel lease and (2) fraud in the sale of the hotel. The jury found for PRA and awarded it compensatory and punitive damages exceeding $9 million.

Coombe and Flory contend that (1) the trial court erroneously failed to dismiss when PRA did not bring the case to trial within five years; (2) PRA elected a contract remedy before trial and was thus precluded from recovering for fraud; and (3) the jury awarded excessive damages for fraud. Coombe asserts that he is entitled to attorney’s fees as the prevailing party in an action on a contract. Flory contends that (1) the award of punitive damages was excessive, and (2) evidence was improperly admitted. PRA cross-appeals, contending that if the court determines that PRA’s fraud recovery is precluded by an election of remedies, then the award of contract damages was erroneous as a matter of law.

Factual and Procedural Background

Flory was the president of Kingsway Services, Inc. (Kingsway), and Coombe was its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.