Grey

People v. Grey

Bad Law
1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 1235·225 Cal. App. 3d 1336·275 Cal. Rptr. 572·90 Daily Journal DAR 13911·90 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8718
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 28, 1990C008028California1,406 words

Opinion

Opinion

Carr, J.

As part of a plea bargain, defendant pled nolo contendere to one count of assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a) (1)) and an allegation that he used a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 12022, subd. (d)) with the understanding that he would be sentenced to not more than the middle term plus the one-year enhancement for deadly weapon use. In exchange, the court dismissed one count of felony infliction of corporal injury on a spouse (Pen. Code, § 273.5) along with an associated deadly weapon-use allegation (Pen. Code, § 12022, subd. (b)). Thereafter, the court denied defendant’s motion to withdraw the plea and sentenced defendant to state prison for the middle term of three years with the one-year enhancement, for an aggregate sentence of four years. On appeal, defendant asserts the court abused its discretion by denying his motion to withdraw his plea.

I

Initially, we observe that defendant has failed to abide by the requirements of Penal Code section 1237.5 (hereafter section 1237.5). Although the requirement of a certificate of probable cause has been abolished by a recent amendment to 1237.5, a verified statement demonstrating grounds for appeal is still…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.