Hatch

Hatch v. Collins

Good Law
1990 Cal. App. LEXIS 1281·225 Cal. App. 3d 1104·275 Cal. Rptr. 476·90 Daily Journal DAR 13654·90 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8588
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 30, 1990A045292California3,377 words

Opinion

Opinion

Smith, J.

In this action to set aside a foreclosure sale of three parcels of real property which occurred more than seven years ago, plaintiffs and appellants Noel Hatch and Nola Hatch appeal from summary judgments entered in favor of the defendants and respondents, who are the beneficiaries under the deed of trust (Kathryn B. Collins et al., hereafter sometimes referred to as the Collins defendants), the purchasers at the foreclosure sale (hereafter the Emigh-Sanchez defendants) and the sale trustee and its agent (California Land Title Company and Rick Frost). We will affirm for two different but equally compelling reasons.

Background

The moving and opposing papers established the following undisputed facts:

On May 16, 1973, plaintiffs Noel and Nola Hatch, along with other family members (the Hatches) executed a promissory note in favor of the Collins defendants. Pursuant thereto, the Hatches executed and delivered a deed of trust securing four parcels of land located in Solano county, naming themselves as trustors and defendant California Land Title Company as trustee.

In 1982 the Hatches defaulted under their obligations under the promissory note and the Collins defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.