City of Lomita v. City of Torrance

Bad Law
148 Cal. App. 3d 1062·196 Cal. Rptr. 538·1983 Cal. App. LEXIS 2383
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 16, 1983Civ. 67879California2,874 words

Opinion

Opinion

Roth, J.

Respondent City of Torrance (Torrance) owns and operates a municipal airport, the eastern border of which is located at the boundary of Torrance and the City of Lomita (Lomita). Having earlier perceived a need for a master plan relating to the airport’s development, Torrance in 1972 began actively to consider what the plan should be and in December of 1973 obtained from a firm engaged in the preparation of such documents a master plan and an accompanying environmental impact report (EIR). When the latter was determined to be inadequate following public hearings thereon, and in February of 1976, Torrance obtained from a different source a second EIR based on the master plan, and then a third upon the second’s similar rejection. After concluding the third EIR likewise did not meet its requirements, Torrance in April of 1976 prepared its own EIR which following other public hearings was recommended for approval by the Torrance City Council. That recommendation in turn was aired at further public hearings before the council and in August of 1976 a final EIR was approved by that body. Lomita actively participated in all the foregoing hearings and was otherwise involved in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.