Slater

Slater v. Alpha Beta Acme Markets, Inc.

Good Law
118 Cal. Rptr. 561·1975 Cal. App. LEXIS 928·44 Cal. App. 3d 274·72 A.L.R. 3d 1264
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 1975Civ. 43991California1,241 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hastings, J.

Plaintiff, Mollie Slater (Slater) appeals from an adverse judgment entered after the granting of defendant’s motion made at the conclusion of plaintiff’s case pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 631.8. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were signed by the court.

The undisputed facts are as follows: Defendant; Alpha Beta Acme Markets, Inc. (Alpha Beta) operated a supermarket in North Hollywood. Prior to the date of January 19, 1970, and within two months preceding, Alpha Beta had suffered two armed robberies by a person identified by witnesses as the same individual. After each robbery Alpha Beta notified the Los Angeles Police Department.

On January 19, 1970, at approximately 6 p.m., Slater was a customer of Alpha Beta. At this time there were also inside the store two plainclothes officers of the Los Angeles Police department conducting a surveillance of the market’s checkout stands. Alpha Béta cooperated in this endeavor by allowing the officers access to its store. The purpose of the surveillance was to apprehend anyone who might attempt to rob the market, and in particular, to capture the individual who previously robbed the market on two occasions.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.