Westmoreland

People v. Westmoreland

Good Law
129 Cal. Rptr. 554·1976 Cal. App. LEXIS 1547·58 Cal. App. 3d 32
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 4, 1976Docket Nos. 1843, 2556, 2557, 2562California6,398 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gargano, J.

After a joint trial, appellants Ronnie Lynn Westmoreland, Charlene Sue Easley and Shirley Ellen Bramlette were convicted by a jury of kidnaping for the purpose of robbeiy with bodily injury (Pen. Code, § 209), robbery in the first degree (Pen. Code, §§ 211, 211a) and assault with intent to commit murder (Pen. Code, § 217). Appellants have appealed from the judgments entered on the jury’s verdicts, raising numerous contentions for reversal. Because appellants wish to go outside of the record to present additional evidence on a crucial constitutional point, each also has petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus. Accordingly, we have consolidated the habeas corpus proceedings with the appeal. (In re Hwamei (1974) 37 Cal.App.3d 554, 557 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 646 ]; In re Miller (1973) 33 Cal.App.3d 1005, 1009 [ 109 Cal.Rptr. 648 ].)

On Friday, May 18, 1973, Ronnie Westmoreland, Charlene Easley and Shirley Bramlette went to the apartment of Doria Jean Star, who was managing the apartment complex where she was living; Westmoreland and Easley were living together in an apartment in Bakersfield along with Easley’s three children, and they were trying to find another apartment; Star and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.