Borns

Borns v. Butts

Good Law
159 Cal. Rptr. 400·1979 Cal. App. LEXIS 2265·98 Cal. App. 3d 208
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 30, 1979Civ. 44820California403 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rouse, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff and respondent, Theodore John Borns, against defendant and; appellant, Barbara Ann Butts, upon a complaint for damages sustained in a collision between respondent’s motorcycle and appellant’s automobile. ,,

The jury below returned four verdicts:

When the jury was polled, it was discovered that only seven of the jurors had voted for all four verdicts. Appellant thereupon moved for a mistrial, but after hearing argument, the court declined to declare a mistrial or to have the jury return for further deliberations. By entering a verdict when the same nine jurors had not agreed on each special verdict, the court erred. (Earl v. Times-Mirror Co. (1921) 185 Cal. 165, 182-186 [196 P.57]; Schoenbach v. Key System Transit Lines (1959) 168 Cal.App.2d 302, 305 [ 335 P.2d 725 ]; Nelson v. Superior Court (1938) 26 Cal.App.2d 119, 120-122 [ 78 P.2d 1037 ].)

Respondent’s contention that the error was harmless in light of the juror’s voting pattern is rejected for two reasons. First, no “legal verdict” existed below; thus, prejudice is inherent in the entry of an invalid verdict and judgment. (See Schoenbach v. Key System…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.