Garrett

Garrett v. Los Angeles City Unified School District

Good Law
116 Cal. App. 3d 472·172 Cal. Rptr. 170·1981 Cal. App. LEXIS 1466
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 4, 1981Civ. 60214California2,453 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hastings, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment denying Marilyn Garrett’s (appellant) petition for a writ of mandate to compel Los Angeles City Unified School District (School District) to employ her as a teacher. Her employment was refused because she conscientiously objected to a chest X-ray required as a condition of employment.

Facts

Appellant first applied for employment with School District in 1973, and was informed that she would be required to have a chest X-ray. Appellant replied that she might be pregnant and was accordingly allowed to substitute an intradermal tuberculin test (skin test). She had not consulted a doctor or taken a pregnancy test at that time. Appellant was employed by School District as a substitute certificated employee.

In 1975, appellant was again asked by School District to submit to an X-ray and she made the same representation about pregnancy that she had made in 1973. She was again allowed to substitute a skin test. In May of 1976, appellant was offered a contract of probationary certificated employee by School District which offer was conditioned upon appellant submitting to an X-ray of the chest and meeting all of School District’s health…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.