7735 Hollywood Boulevard Venture v. Superior Court

Good Law
116 Cal. App. 3d 901·172 Cal. Rptr. 528·1981 Cal. App. LEXIS 1553
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 16, 1981Civ. 60819California1,594 words

Opinion

Opinion

Compton, J.

We issued an alternative writ of mandate to review the trial court’s order overruling a demurrer to a complaint for personal injuries, which complaint is based on a novel theory of landowner’s liability for the criminal acts of third parties. We conclude that the complaint fails to state a cause of action and the demurrer should have been sustained.

Plaintiff instituted an action against the owner of an apartment house in which she is a tenant. The injury for which she seeks compensation resulted from a forceable rape committed against her by an intruder who forced entrance into her apartment. The crime was committed at approximately 4:30 in the morning.

The property owner’s liability for such injury is alleged to rest on a combination of two factors. (1) knowledge that violent crime, including burglary and rape, had occurred in the “general area, vicinity and neighborhood” within the previous six months; that some of these crimes, according to media accounts, were committed by the same person who had been dubbed “The westside rapist” and (2) negligent failure to replace a burned out light which had been “lighting the outside of plaintiff’s apartment.”

The complaint,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.