Depretto

Depretto v. Superior Court

Good Law
116 Cal. App. 3d 36·171 Cal. Rptr. 810·1981 Cal. App. LEXIS 1426
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 1981Civ. 51165California795 words

Opinion

Opinion

Smith, J.

Petitioner, plaintiff in a personal injury action, seeks relief by writ of mandate to compel respondent superior court to set aside its order of November 4, 1980, which transferred her action from the superior court to the municipal court. The order was made after petitioner’s action had been submitted to arbitration pursuant to the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11, subdivision (a), an award of damages in the sum of $6,000 had been made, petitioner had requested a trial de nova pursuant to the provisions of section 1141.20, and settlement negotiations had proved unsuccessful. We have concluded that petitioner is entitled to relief: the order deprives petitioner of her right to establish damages within the jurisdiction of the superior court. (Davis v. Superior Court (1972) 25 Cal.App.3d 596 , 600-601 [ 102 Cal.Rptr. 238 ].)

On September 1, 1978, when petitioner filed her complaint for damages with the superior court, the monetary jurisdiction of the municipal court was $5,000 (former § 89, now § 86). By amendment (Stats. 1978, ch. 146, § 1, operative July 1, 1979), $15,000 was substituted for $5,000 wherever it appeared in the statute and subdivision…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.