Huggins

People v. Huggins

Good Law
182 Cal. App. 3d 828·1986 Cal. App. LEXIS 1754·227 Cal. Rptr. 547
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 24, 1986H000448California1,085 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brauer, J.

Defendant was charged with first degree burglary arising out of the forcible entry into a home and theft of money contained in a letter indoors. He pleaded no contest in the face of virtually conclusive evidence consisting of four fingerprints and the absence of a benign explanation for their presence in the house. Thereafter substitute counsel woke up to the fact that the issue defendant wished to raise on appeal would not survive such a plea, even with a certificate of probable cause, as the alleged error was not of constitutional dimension nor undermined the legality of the proceedings. (People v. De Vaughan (1977) 18 Cal.3d 889, 895-896 [ 135 Cal.Rptr. 786 , 558 P.2d 872 ].) He thereupon successfully moved to vacate the plea and submitted the cause on the transcript of the preliminary hearing, a so-called “Bunnell plea.” (Bunnell v. Superior Court (1975) 13 Cal.3d 592 [ 119 Cal.Rptr. 302 , 531 P.2d 1086 ].) Defendant was promptly found guilty.

The sole ground for appeal is the refusal of the magistrate at the preliminary examination and of the trial judge at a pretrial hearing to admit the hearsay declaration of Teresa Grace Nugent, a neighbor of the victim, offered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.