Forrand

Forrand v. Foodmaker, Inc.

Good Law
182 Cal. App. 3d 196·1986 Cal. App. LEXIS 1698·227 Cal. Rptr. 74
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 10, 1986B006084California2,544 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hastings, J.

After a jury trial, the negligence of defendant/appellant Foodmaker, Inc., doing business as Jack-in-the-Box (appellant), was found to have been the sole cause of injuries sustained by plaintiff/respondent Keith W. Forrand (respondent). To have reached this verdict, the jury believed the following to be true:

On July 17, 1977, at approximately 6:50 a.m., Glenn Dore (Dore) a 15-year-old runaway, committed an armed robbery against appellant Jack-in- the-Box restaurant. He knocked on the drive-through window; and when Michelle Laberteaux (Laberteaux), the shift manager, responded, he placed a 3Vi-foot-long, .22 caliber rifle on the window ledge, pushed it into her stomach and demanded money. She eventually put money in a restaurant bag, and almost simultaneously with this act or shortly thereafter, respondent arrived at the restaurant to buy a cup of coffee, as he had done almost daily for a year. As he entered the restaurant, Thelma Hotstetter (Hotstetter), a waitress, exclaimed, “Stop him!” She did not tell respondent a robbery had just occurred nor that the robber was armed. Respondent, believing the person had failed to pay all or part of his order, returned to his car,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.