Millaud

Millaud v. Superior Court

Good Law
182 Cal. App. 3d 471·1986 Cal. App. LEXIS 1719·227 Cal. Rptr. 222
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 3, 1986D004472California1,952 words

Opinion

Opinion

Work, J.

Terry Wynn Millaud, defendant in a criminal prosecution charging homicide, robbery, and other offenses, seeks a writ of mandate to compel pretrial criminal discovery. (Hill v. Superior Court (1974) 10 Cal.3d 812, 816 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 257 , 518 P.2d 1353 , 95 A.L.R.3d 820 ]; Joe Z. v. Superior Court (1970) 3 Cal.3d 797, 801 [ 91 Cal.Rptr. 594 , 478 P.2d 26 ].) We have concluded discovery was improperly denied and the writ shall issue.

The charges with which we are concerned arise out of a homicide occurring at an Alpha Beta Supermarket located at 3400 Palm Avenue in San Diego. They allege Millaud attempted to steal an automobile and water jug from a Cecelia Irwin, who phoned her husband, Charles Irwin, and son, Dennis Irwin, for help. They came to the store and became involved in a fight with the man Mrs. Irwin pointed out as her assailant. After an extensive scuffle, the assailant stabbed and killed Charles Irwin.

After the incident, Alpha Beta hired a private investigating service whose employees interviewed witnesses and prepared notes and tape recordings of those conversations and photographed and videotaped the crime scene. Millaud’s counsel served a subpoena duces…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.