Fennen

Fennen v. Nakayema

Good Law

494 F. Supp. 2d 1148·2007 WL 1742339·2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43183

United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20072:05-cv-1776-GEB-GGH-PCalifornia2,488 words

Opinion

Burrell, J.

ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant .to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On March 27, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 27, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Petitioner is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . In 2003 petitioner was convicted of possession of methamphetamine for sale, plus enhancements for a prior…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.