Roberts

Roberts v. C.R. England, Inc.

Good Law
827 F. Supp. 2d 1078·2011 WL 5863962·2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134839
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaNovember 22, 2011C 11-2586 CWCalifornia4,275 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wilken, J.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIM UNDER THE CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE INVESTMENT LAW AND DEFERRING RULING ON MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE (Docket No. 18)

Plaintiffs Charles Roberts and Kenneth McKay have brought a putative class action against Defendants C.R. England, Inc., Opportunity Leasing, Inc. and Horizon Truck Sales and Leasing, LLC, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated. Roberts and McKay allege numerous causes of action under California, Utah and Indiana law, as well as the Federal Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act.

Roberts and McKay each entered into two contracts, both of which contain a mandatory forum selection clause that identifies Utah as the required forum. Defendants invoke the forum selection clauses and move to dismiss this action, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and (3) for improper venue, and move to dismiss or transfer the action, under Title 28 U.S.C. § 1406 (a). In the event that the Court does not dismiss or transfer the case pursuant to the forum selection clauses, Defendants seek to transfer the action for convenience, pursuant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.