Ambrozic

People v. Ambrozic

Good Law
1970 Cal. App. LEXIS 2101·8 Cal. App. 3d 867·87 Cal. Rptr. 899
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 17, 1970Crim. 7874California1,300 words

Opinion

Opinion

Elkington, J.

Defendant Ambrozic was convicted of violating Health and Safety Code sections 11530, .11531 and 11910, following a nonjury trial.

On the section 11530 charge, judgment sentencing him to state prison was imposed. On the remaining charges, sections 11531 and 11910, imposition of judgment was suspended and he was placed on probation for five years and three years, respectively. He has appealed from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial; he has not appealed from the orders grantng probation. However, we treat his notice of appeal as including the orders granting probation, as obviously intended. “[A] notice of appeal will be liberally construed to permit a hearing on the merits and avoid a dismissal because of some technical defect or irregularity.” (People v. Robinson, 43 Cal.2d 143, 145 [ 271 P.2d 872 ].) The order denying a new trial being nonappealable (see Pen. Code, § 1237), the appeal therefrom will be dismissed.

There is no conflict as to the relevant evidence.

Law enforcement authorities held many arrest warrants resulting from Marin County narcotic violations observed through undercover police activity. Involved county, state and federal officers…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.