Ford

Ford v. Superior Court

Bad Law
188 Cal. App. 3d 737·1986 Cal. App. LEXIS 2413·233 Cal. Rptr. 607
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 18, 1986Docket Nos. B012860, B010793California1,726 words

Opinion

Opinion

Danielson, J.

Plaintiff Eunice Ford (Ford), on behalf of herself and the class she seeks to represent, appeals from the order dismissing the entire action based upon her amended verified complaint for injunctive and declaratory relief; and plaintiffs Roes 1 through 200 purport to appeal from the minute order of January 16, 1985, denying their application for a preliminary injunction.

In these consolidated matters, we review orders of the superior court (1) denying a preliminary injunction sought by plaintiffs and petitioners, Roes 1 through 200, in connection with their verified complaint for injunction and declaratory relief, and (2) dismissing the action following the sustaining without leave to amend of the demurrer of defendants and respondents superior court and clerk of the superior court to the amended verified complaint filed by appellant Eunice Ford, an unnamed plaintiff in the original complaint, individually and on behalf of the class she seeks to represent.

The plaintiffs allege that they are all persons named or otherwise identified in documentary exhibits in Los Angeles Superior Court case number C 420153, Church of Scientology of California v. Gerald Armstrong. That…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.