Market Ins. Corp. v. Integrity Ins. Co.

Good Law
188 Cal. App. 3d 1095·1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 1304·233 Cal. Rptr. 751
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 22, 1987B022057California1,259 words

Opinion

Opinion

Eagleson, J.

We hold that the arbitration clause in two general agency agreements applies to an insurance agent’s action against an insurance company to collect commissions under the contracts. We therefore reverse the trial court’s order denying appellant Integrity Insurance Company’s petition to compel arbitration.

Facts

In two similar 1979 and 1982 contracts, respondent Market Insurance Corporation agreed to act as appellant Integrity Insurance Company’s general agent in various insurance transactions. A large part of each written contract contained complex formulas for calculating respondent’s commissions on the basis of premiums collected and losses reported. Both contracts also provided that “differences of opinion of interpretation” of the contract “shall be submitted for arbitration to two officers or executives ... of insurance companies,” one to be chosen by each party. The one-page arbitration provision also stated that the arbitrators must meet in Paramus, New Jersey, which is where appellant’s corporate headquarters are located.

Contract negotiations were conducted primarily by Mr. Stem, then vice president of appellant Integrity, and Mr. Uritz, president of respondent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.