In Re Michael S.

Good Law
188 Cal. App. 3d 1448·234 Cal. Rptr. 84
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 28, 1987F006312California7,651 words

Opinion

Opinion

Peter C. Carton, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Minors.

OPINION

HAMLIN, J.

Mardell Y., the mother of three dependent children, Michael S., Latasha S., and Julise J. (collectively the minors), appeals from the dispositional order of the Juvenile Court of Kings County following a hearing on a supplemental petition filed in that court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 387. [1] Mardell Y. (hereafter mother) contends the court committed reversible error in failing to include in the dispositional order removing the minors from her custody some provision for further reunification services. Under the particular facts of this case we conclude further reunification services were appropriate and the trial court abused its discretion in failing to provide for them in its dispositional order; we will reverse the judgment.

On June 30, 1983, petitions were filed in the Juvenile Court of Stanislaus County alleging the minors came within the provisions of section 300, subdivision (d), i.e., their home was unfit because of mother's alleged abuse of Michael. The petition stated mother had struck Michael in the forehead with an unopened can of soda, causing a two-inch…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.