Clark v. Bellefonte Insurance

Good Law
113 Cal. App. 3d 326·169 Cal. Rptr. 832·1980 Cal. App. LEXIS 2547
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 16, 1980Civ. 45795California4,197 words

Opinion

Opinion

Boone, J.

Defendant Bellefonte Insurance Company appeals from a judgment for plaintiff Lorel Clark on a special jury verdict in the sum of $15,000. The verdict is based upon a finding of breach of contract by defendant Bellefonte in connection with an insurance policy issued by Bellefonte to plaintiff. Defendant claims error in denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and in the giving and refusal of certain jury instructions. We have concluded that the defendant was entitled to judgment notwithstanding the verdict; hence, consideration of the other contentions is not necessary.

Plaintiff Clark operated an automobile “detailing” business, as L. C. Auto Polishing, at 7046 Mission Street, Daly City, in a rented wood frame building. The business consisted of cleaning and polishing automobiles in preparation for sale or resale by automobile dealers. In general, plaintiff obtained vehicles from the lots of dealers with whom he contracted, brought the vehicles to his premises, cleaned and polished them, and returned the vehicles to the dealers. Cars were kept overnight in the building on occasions.

In 1975 plaintiff obtained garage liability insurance through Trinity…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.