Estate of La Motta

Good Law
7 Cal. App. 3d 960·86 Cal. Rptr. 880
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 22, 1970Docket Nos. 33592, 34193, 34536California2,556 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, and Elizabeth Miller, Deputy Attorney General, for Objector and Appellant.

John D. Maharg, County Counsel, and Gerald F. Crump, Deputy County Counsel, for Petitioner and Respondent.

MacFarlane, Schaefer & Haun and Jeremy V. Wisot for Claimant and Respondent.

OPINION

KAUS, P.J.

These three consolidated appeals from portions of orders settling the first and final accounts and reports of the public administrator present common questions of law. Although there are slight procedural differences, they are immaterial to the determinative issues. For the sake of simplicity we shall discuss the facts and issues as if a single appeal were pending.

The public administrator petitioned for letters of administration alleging that the decedent had died in Los Angeles County over 10 years before, that the estate consisted of certain personal property, that no will had been found and that the heirs were unknown. Letters issued.

One Edward O. Ballard then filed a petition for compensation "re discovery of estate assets." In that petition he claimed that the assets of the estate had been located by his efforts and that the reasonable value of his services…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.