Lembo

Lembo v. Texaco, Inc.

Good Law
194 Cal. App. 3d 531·1987 Cal. App. LEXIS 2065·239 Cal. Rptr. 596·8 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2567
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 27, 1987B005789California3,146 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gates, J.

On August 13, 1987, our Supreme Court, having earlier granted review in this matter, remanded it to us “with directions to refile [the] opinion [we had] filed on June 12, 1986, with appropriate citations to Pilot Life Insurance Co. v. Dedeaux (1987) 481 U.S. 41 [ 95 L.Ed.2d 39 , 107 S.Ct. 1549 ]. The Reporter of Decisions is directed to publish in the Official Appellate Reports the opinion as refiled.”

We comply.

Defendant Texaco, Inc., appeals from the judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict which awarded plaintiff Joe M. Lembo $250,000 in general damages and $1 million in punitive damages and plaintiff Winston A. Keene $500,000 in general damages. Texaco contends that “California courts do not have jurisdiction of plaintiffs’ causes of action because of ERISA preemption,” arguing in the alternative that “[e]ven if the state courts have jurisdiction to apply state law to this action, the judgment must be reversed.”

Because we find the preemption issue determinative, we restrict our recitation of “facts” to those alleged in plaintiffs’ complaint. We note, however, that the evidence adduced at trial, even if fully credited, could but confirm these allegations. In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.