Isherwood

Isherwood v. Hyrosen Properties, Inc.

Good Law
194 Cal. App. 3d 33·240 Cal. Rptr. 157
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 15, 198717221California1,383 words

Opinion

Opinion

[Opinion certified for partial publication. [*] ]

OPINION

REESE, J.

Defendant Hyrosen Properties, Inc., appeals from the order denying its motion to set aside the default and the judgment by default. The record on appeal is a clerk's transcript. On October 19, 1984, plaintiff Evelyn Isherwood filed a complaint against defendant. On March 4, 1985, defendant answered the complaint. On January 8, 1986, notice of trial, for January 30, 1986, was mailed by the court clerk to defendant's attorneys. Defendant did not appear at the trial and $17,500 was awarded to plaintiff after testimony was taken and exhibits were admitted into evidence. On March 13, 1986, defendant moved to set aside the judgment alleging it did not receive actual notice of the trial date. The motion for relief from default was denied.

(1) A motion to vacate a default and set aside the default judgment is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and will not be set aside in the absence of a clear showing of abuse of that discretion. ( Lint v. Chisholm (1981) 121 Cal. App.3d 615, 619 [ 177 Cal. Rptr. 314 ].) All presumptions are made in favor of the trial court's order and the appellant's burden is to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.