Watt

County of Josephine v. Watt

Good Law
539 F. Supp. 696·64 A.L.R. Fed. 503·12 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21079·17 ERC (BNA) 1769·17 ERC 1768
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 1982C-81-3262-WAICalifornia5,659 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ingram, J.

DECISION

The motions before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment and additional alternative motions of plaintiffs for specification of issues without substantial conflict under the provisions of Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(d) and for preliminary injunction.

PARTIES

The parties plaintiff are four southern Oregon counties: Josephine, Douglas, Klamath and Curry; Grants Pass and Josephine County Chamber of Commerce, a nonprofit corporation; North West Timber Association, a non-profit association; Southern Oregon Resources Alliance, a non-profit corporation; Rough & Ready Lumber Company, a corporation; Spaulding & Son, Inc., a corporation; and Elizabeth Van Gordon, an individual citizen of Oregon.

The parties defendant are James Watt, Secretary of the Interior of the United States; the United States Department of the Interior; Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service, an agency and element, of the Department of the Interior; John R. Block, Secretary of Agriculture of the United States; the United States Department of Agriculture; and the United States Forest Service.

The State of California, the Environmental Defense Fund, Sierra Club, California Trout, and Save the American…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.