Qualcomm Inc. v. Broadcom Corp.

Good Law
539 F. Supp. 2d 1214·2007 WL 2296441·88 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1141·2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57136
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 6, 20073:05-cr-01958California12,230 words

Opinion

Opinion

Brewster, J.

ORDER ON REMEDY FOR FINDING OF WAIVER

I. INTRODUCTION

On March 21, 2007, this Court entered an Order (1) finding in favor of Defendant Broadcom Corporation (“Broadcom”) and against Plaintiff Qualcomm Incorporated (“Qualcomm”) on Broadcom’s Third Affirmative Defense that U.S. Patent Nos. 5,452,104 (Pl’s Trial Ex. 1) (“the '104 patent”) and 5,576,767 (Pi’s Trial Ex. 3) (“the '767 patent”) are unenforceable due to waiver; and (2) setting hearing on an Order to Show Cause as to what the appropriate remedy for Qualcomm’s waiver should be. (Doc. No. 528 at 2.)

Following hearing on the Order to Show Cause and careful consideration of relevant court and deposition transcripts, declarations, and other documents submitted by both parties, the Court hereby issues the following remedy for Qualcomm’s waiver: that the '104 and '767 patents, their continuations, continuations-in-part, divi sions, reissues, or any other dependent or derivative patents of either patent, shall be and are hereby ordered unenforceable.

II. BACKGROUND

Qualcomm filed the present suit against Broadcom for patent infringement of the '104 and '767 patents on October 14, 2005, based on Broadcom’s manufacture, sale,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.