Watt

Pacific Legal Foundation v. Watt

Good Law
539 F. Supp. 841·13 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20109·17 ERC (BNA) 1801·17 ERC 1801·1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17799
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 1982CV 78-3464-AAH(SX)California3,868 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hauk, J.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

FINDINGS OF FACT

1. Plaintiff Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) is a nonprofit corporation organized under the laws of the State of California. PLF is a membership organization. John B. Kilroy, Sr., is a member of PLF who lives and works in the area to be impacted by the Los Angeles/Orange County Metropolitan Area (LA/OMA). projects. PLF brought suit on behalf of itself and its members. PLF and its members will be injured by the actions of defendants.

2. Defendant James G. Watt is the Secretary of the Interior. As such he has primary responsibility for enforcement of the provisions of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and regulations issued pursuant thereto. 16 U.S.C. § 1540 (e)(1).

3. Defendant Anne M. Gorsueh is the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and as such is responsible for insuring that EPA complies with the provisions of ESA, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Clean Water Act (CWA), and the regulations issued pursuant thereto.

4. Defendant EPA is a federal agency as that term is used in ESA and, as such, is required to comply with the provisions of ESA and regulations issued…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.