Kuchta

Kuchta v. Allied Builders Corp.

Good Law
1971 Cal. App. LEXIS 1097·21 Cal. App. 3d 541·98 Cal. Rptr. 588
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 24, 1971Civ. 10966California2,624 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

The plaintiffs, Joseph G. Kuchta and Gertrude Ann Kuchta, sued the defendants Allied Builders Corporation [Allied] and its franchisee, Raphael [Ralph] Weiner, for the purpose of re covering damages for fraud and breach of a building contract wherein the franchisee agreed to construct an outdoor patio and living area in the rear yard of plaintiffs’ home. The jury returned with the following verdicts: (1) $5,585 in general damages against Allied and Weiner jointly and severally; (2) $3,750 in punitive damages against Allied alone; and (3) an additional $3,750 punitive damages against Weiner individually. Judgment was entered accordingly, and only Allied appeals.

Allied raises the following issues in seeking to invalidate the judgment: (1) Weiner was an independent contractor, not an agent and, therefore, Allied may not be held liable for Weiner’s fraud or breach of contract (2) the trial court improperly denied Allied’s motion to compel plantiffs to make an election between it and Weiner; (3) the punitive damage award against the franchisor was invalid as a matter of law; and (4) the court erred in refusing to render an instruction on damages offered by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.