Tielsch

Tielsch v. City of Anaheim

Good Law
160 Cal. App. 3d 570·1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 2564·206 Cal. Rptr. 738
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 1984Civ. 30682California1,151 words

Opinion

Opinion

Crosby, J.

George P. Tielsch appeals from the judgment denying his petition for peremptory writ of mandate to direct the City of Anaheim to either rescind the decision to assign him to a new position or grant him an administrative appeal of that determination.

I

Tielsch was appointed chief of police for the City of Anaheim in January 1979. As the result of health problems caused by work-related stress, he was placed on a salaried leave of absence in March 1982. On June 11, 1982, he applied to the Public Employees’ Retirement System for disability retirement.

Pursuant to Government Code section 21024, the city was required to determine whether Tielsch was “incapacitated for the performance of duty.” The Anaheim City Council delegated this responsibility to the city manager (Gov. Code, § 21034). He then issued administrative regulation 2.67 (A. R. 2.67) in order to establish a procedure for the city to determine the eligibility of local safety members for disability retirement. As required by A. R. 2.67, the city manager appointed an independent hearing officer to take evidence and make findings and recommendations on Tielsch’s application. The hearing was scheduled for January 20,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.