Creighton

Creighton v. City of Santa Monica

Bad Law
160 Cal. App. 3d 1011·207 Cal. Rptr. 78
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 12, 1984B003559California3,919 words

Opinion

Opinion

Michael Heumann, Stephen P. Wiman, Marsha Jones Moutrie, Joel Martin Levy and Barbara O'Hearn for Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Stacey & Jones, Sherman Stacey, David M. Shell and Craig Mordoh for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

COMPTON, Acting P.J.

In April 1979, the Santa Monica City electorate amended its city charter by initiative measure establishing a comprehensive system of controls on residential rents. To administer this system the amendment provided for the creation of a permanent rent control board (Board), consisting of five popularly elected commissioners, with the authority to regulate maximum rents and to issue permits for the removal of rental units from the rental housing market. The new charter provision specifically empowered the Board to "hire and pay necessary staff" (Santa Monica City Charter, art. XVIII, § 1803(f)(6)) and to "finance its reasonable and necessary expenses by charging landlords annual registration fees." (Santa Monica City Charter (Charter), art. XVIII, § 1803(n).) By a series of subsequently enacted ordinances, the Santa Monica City Council affirmed the authority of the Board to determine its financial and personnel policies.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.