Kempthorne
Natural Resources Defense Council v. Kempthorne
Opinion
Opinion
Wanger, J.
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT-IN-TERYENOR STATE WATER CONTRACTORS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT (Doc. 502)
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, ET AL. MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT (Doc. 503)
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT-IN-TERVENOR CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT (Doc. 516)
I. Introduction.
This case concerns the ongoing controversy regarding the threatened delta smelt species as it is impacted by the coordinated operations of the federally-managed Central Valley Project (“CVP”) and California’s State Water Project (“SWP”). In the motions now before the court, defendant-intervenors State Water Contractors (“SWC”); San Luis & Delta Mendota Water Authority (“SLDMWA”), Westlands Water District (“Westlands”), California Farm Bureau (“CFB”), and Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District (“GCID”), et al. (collectively “San Luis Parties”); and the California Department of Water Resources (“DWR”), have filed three separate motions to dismiss Natural Resources Defense Council’s, et al. (“Plaintiffs”) second…