Shamburger

Shamburger v. Superior Court

Good Law
160 Cal. App. 3d 484·1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 2557·207 Cal. Rptr. 586
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 1984A028654California1,178 words

Opinion

Opinion

White, J.

This petition, brought by a defendant being tried for only one murder, challenges the trial court’s failure to dismiss the special circumstance allegation that the defendant “has in this proceeding been convicted of more than one offense of murder in the first or second degree.” (Pen. Code, § 190.2, subd. (a)(3).) The present incongruity arose because petitioner successfully moved to sever two murder charges against him. We conclude that the trial court erred in failing to dismiss the allegation under Penal Code section 190.2, subdivision (a)(3). We also explain that the severance automatically conferred on the prosecutor the right to amend the information to charge the special circumstance that the defendant “was previously convicted of murder in the first degree or second degree.” (Pen. Code, § 190.2, subd. (a)(2).) Both results are dictated by the Supreme Court’s decision in Williams v. Superior Court (1984) 36 Cal.3d 441 [ 204 Cal.Rptr. 700 , 683 P.2d 699 ].

The felony complaint charged petitioner with the murders of Jerome Nance and William Fisher and alleged the special circumstance of conviction of more than one murder “in this proceeding.” (Pen. Code, § 190.2,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.