Scherer

Scherer v. Mark

Caution
135 Cal. Rptr. 90·1976 Cal. App. LEXIS 2165·64 Cal. App. 3d 834
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 14, 1976Civ. 45815California2,981 words

Opinion

Opinion

Beach, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant Dr. Howard Mark. The motion for summary judgment was based on the action being barred by the statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc., § 340.5).

Plaintiff allegedly was injured on or about October 23, 1971, while a patient at defendant Memorial Hospital of Southern California (Hospital). On June 14, 1972, she filed a complaint for personal injuries against Hospital and “Does I through XXX, inclusive.” It was alleged that “each of the Defendants designated herein as a Doe is in some manner responsible for the events and happenings hereinafter alleged.” The complaint further alleged that defendants “negligently and carelessly treated Plaintiff in that they failed to follow a standard of care in common practice ... in the care and treatment of Plaintiff’s condition” including watching over her while she was taking a bath and providing plaintiff with a safe place to take a bath, knowing that she was handicapped and under medication; that as a result she fell and was injured.

On December 5, 1973, an amendment was made to insert the name of Howard Mark, M.D., in the complaint for the fictitiously named Doe…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.