Ming Lin v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

Good Law
428 F. App'x 741
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 21, 201108-70839California254 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Ming Guang Lin, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the new standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the Real ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th Cir. 2010). We grant the petition for review and remand.

The agency’s adverse credibility determination is not supported by substantial evidence. See id. at 1042-44 (adverse credibility findings must be “specific and cogent” and the IJ must consider petitioner’s explanation for a perceived inconsistency); Tekle v. Mukasey, 533 F.3d 1044, 1053 (9th Cir.2008) (adverse credibility finding based on mischaracterization of testimony is not supported); Shah v. INS, 220 F.3d 1062, 1071 (9th Cir.2000) (an ad verse credibility finding cannot be based on speculation and conjecture).

We remand for the BIA to reexamine Lin’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.