Reece

Reece v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

Good Law
134 Cal. Rptr. 698·1976 Cal. App. LEXIS 2111·64 Cal. App. 3d 675
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 7, 1976Civ. 15931California2,775 words

Opinion

Opinion

Paras, J.

This is an original petition for a writ of review filed under Business and Professions Code sections 23090 and 23090.5. The Acting Director of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (hereinafter “ABC”) seeks reversal of a decision of the ABC Appeals Board which held a departmental rule (Cal. Admin. Code, tit. 4, § 58), unconstitutional under California and United States equal protection standards. The rule in question states that the spouse of a person who is disqualified under section 62 from holding a liquor license is similarly so disqualified.

Virginia Scheffel is the wife of Arch Scheffel, a 21-year veteran of, and active as the Commander of the Detective Division in the San Joaquin County Sheriff’s Department. In November 1974, she leased a groceiy store and cafe in a rural area of San Joaquin County. The lessors had operated a similar business on the premises for many years prior to leasing it to Virginia, and had been holders of an off-sale beer and wine license. Virginia submitted an application for such a license to the ABC, accompanied by a written and signed post-nuptial agreement stating that the business was entirely her separate property over which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.