In Re Order to Show Cause

Good Law
741 F. Supp. 1379·1990 WL 96792·1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10447
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 1990C-89-3024-CALCalifornia3,783 words

Opinion

Opinion

Legge, J.

AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

This is a proceeding on an order to show cause, issued by another judge of this court, as to why sanctions should not be imposed upon the eleven respondent attorneys. The order to show cause arises from a criminal case in this court, United States of America v. Rudolph Henderson, et al., No. CR-87-0398 (N.D.Cal. filed June 4, 1987). That was a multi-defendant drug prosecution, in which these respondent attorneys were counsel for the defendants.

I.

Shortly before the scheduled trial of that case, respondents made a motion to recuse the trial judge under 28 U.S.C. § 455 (1982). The motion was based in part on the alleged personal friendship between the trial judge and the prosecuting attorney, and on the possibility of ex parte submissions having been made by the prosecutor. The motion was also made upon the ground that the trial judge had allegedly made statements to one Ora Green, which if true would indicate bias by the trial judge against the defendants.

The recusal motion was addressed to the trial judge, and was signed by respondents. It was supported by a joint affidavit of the defendants, and by the declaration of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.