United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union v. Shell Oil Co.

Good Law
602 F. Supp. 3d 1087·602 F.3d 1087·2010 WL 1571190·16 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1·2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 8208
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 21, 201010-55269California1,447 words

Opinion

Opinion

Silverman, J.

Defendants removed this putative class action from state court pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 (d), 1453. After denying class certification, the district court concluded that it no longer had jurisdiction and remanded the case to state court. We accepted defendants’ appeal to consider whether the denial of class certification divests federal courts of jurisdiction over cases removed under § 1332(d). Today we join the Seventh and Eleventh Circuits in holding that it does not. If the putative class action was properly removed to begin with, the subsequent denial of Rule 23 class certification does not divest the district court of jurisdiction. The case remains removed and is not to be remanded to state court.

Procedural Background

Plaintiffs United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC (USW), Richard Floyd, and Eduardo Carbajal filed their class action against Shell Oil Company, Equilon Enterprises LLC, and Tesoro Refining and Marketing Company in California state, court. The complaint asserts that defendants’ oil refineries violated California…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.